A defensible methodology measures the underlying activity separately from the desired price path.
The following indicators can support assessment; none mechanically proves a particular price increase.
| Factor | Evidence to publish | What it establishes |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption | Repeat economic users and genuine transactions; exclude self-transfers. | Whether people actually use QTC. |
| Demand | Independent completed purchases and executable bids. | Willingness to buy at observable prices and sizes. |
| Security | Sustained mining work, independent operator concentration and technical reviews. | Evidence relevant to network resilience. |
| Supply | Verified issuance, holdings, concentration and unlocks. | Potential dilution and selling pressure. |
| Liquidity | Committed buying funds, order depth and execution at different sizes. | Whether holders can sell meaningful quantities. |
Published methodology, data quality, oversight and accountability are central themes in the IOSCO benchmark principles. This proposed framework has not been assessed for conformity with those principles. [2]